Sign up for our daily Newsletter and stay up to date with all the latest news!

Subscribe I am already a subscriber

You are using software which is blocking our advertisements (adblocker).

As we provide the news for free, we are relying on revenues from our banners. So please disable your adblocker and reload the page to continue using this site.
Thanks!

Click here for a guide on disabling your adblocker.

Sign up for our daily Newsletter and stay up to date with all the latest news!

Subscribe I am already a subscriber
Michaël van Duijnhoven, N&S Quality, on food safety:

“Do not make it too easy for attackers, put up a barrier”

Human communication makes companies inherently vulnerable. Mistakes will be made where people work. Usually unintentionally, but still with far-reaching consequences. Even more so when the mistakes are intentional, and food safety is at stake. “Vigilance is in order,” says Michaël van Duijnhoven of N&S Quality. “Once safety measures within organisations become routine, disaster often strikes. It is important to open our eyes to that type of company blindness.”


Lecture Michaël van Duijnhoven during the MFC-Event 2016 on 19 September 2016. Theme of the lecture: ‘Food safety and terrorism.’ The event also featured other speakers and companies. Please click here for the photo report.

Human agency
N&S Quality is both a training institute and a consultancy. The company offers complete solutions in the fields of quality control and food safety. The food industry is often startled by infections, due to germs or harmful substances, not least those caused by human error. By exposing painful areas within organisations, companies can arm themselves against such impending doom. Attackers can easily get a grip on food safety at unguarded moments, and severely disrupt it. The consequences would then be incalculable. Just one dead cow has to end up in the water supply…” Van Duijnhoven warns.

Terrorism, blackmail and resentment
“Companies must remain vigilant. That starts by acknowledging that terrorism is a real danger. But sometimes the problems are of a different order. For example, a Coop supermarket was once blackmailed by an unsavoury person who caused a dairy infection. That person threatened further escalation if the supermarket did not pay him a significant sum. Another example, in which resentment played a large part, was the scandal with needles in aeroplane meals from catering company Gate Gourmet in Amsterdam. Dissatisfaction in the workplace most likely led to sabotage by an angry employee. Such dangers can never be completely ruled out. But we must always strive to limit such ‘company risks’ to a minimum.”

Hermetically sealed system
In order to guarantee food safety within the food industry, guidelines have been drawn up by the Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI). The norms established therein function as an internationally recognised mark of quality. “An important given with this is that one person within the company has to bear responsibility for safety within the organisation. That person needs to report all findings to the management team. It is also important to establish where the biggest vulnerabilities are within the company regarding terrorism, blackmail and employee resentment.”

Does the company take precautionary measures on the outside of the building? Are the entrances to various segments within the companies, such as loading docks, supervised? Is there an entry system or are there outside surveillance cameras? And internally: are background checks being done on employees and visitors? Is it monitored which employees manage the air ducts, cooling systems and hazardous substances? All of these are questions that should generate awareness, and expose painful points within the management.

Putting up a barrier is necessary
It is an art to be able to answer all of these questions with ‘yes.’ “But in order to test whether all of the safety leaks have actually been properly closed, it is not a bad idea to audit at random. Send an outsider to the company, who you have enter the building under false pretences. This is necessary in order not to fall into a sort of ‘company blindness,’ where safety measures become routine within the organisation. Put up a barrier, do not make it too easy for them,” Van Duijnhoven concludes.

For more information:
Michaël van Duijnhoven
N&S Quality Consultants B.V.
Hogeweg 129
5301 LL Zaltbommel
The Netherlands
T: +31 (0)418 575 859
F: +31 (0)418 575 855
office@ns-quality.nl
www.ns-quality.nl
Publication date: