Sign up for our daily Newsletter and stay up to date with all the latest news!

Subscribe I am already a subscriber

You are using software which is blocking our advertisements (adblocker).

As we provide the news for free, we are relying on revenues from our banners. So please disable your adblocker and reload the page to continue using this site.
Thanks!

Click here for a guide on disabling your adblocker.

Sign up for our daily Newsletter and stay up to date with all the latest news!

Subscribe I am already a subscriber

Citrus Australia submission addresses significant flaws in Fair Work Commission piece rate decision

Citrus Australia has addressed significant flaws in the recent Fair Work Commission decision to install a floor price for workers under the Horticulture Award through an official submission (here).

The submission includes an alternative variation, which attempts to provide a safety net for inexperienced workers and incentive for increased productivity – which is the core tenant of the piece rate.

“Citrus Australia finds any exploitation of employees to be abhorrent,” CEO Nathan Hancock said.

“So it is disappointing that the decisions taken by the Fair Work Commission (Commission) will have no impact on reducing exploitation, whilst creating numerous detrimental effects on both productivity and costs within the wider horticulture industry.

“It is doubtful based on the reading of this decision that the Commission has any relative experience or deep knowledge of horticulture production, itinerant work, or regional employment.

“The Commission’s variations will not reduce exploitation in the horticulture industry where it exists, because those who exploit their employees, don’t adhere to the law.

“In fact, this variation will have unintended consequences on law abiding employers, less able employees, and the end consumer.”

Horticultural crops are perishable and require efficient, productive employees to harvest them in a timely manner to meet orders, to avoid environmental impacts, and to prevent food waste.

The piece rate was designed to encourage and reward productivity within the workforce and increase efficiencies within a unique production system.

“Citrus Australia refutes the claim that citrus businesses avoid paying employees fairly through the use of piece rates, which are an award wage.

“Numerous examples exist of pieceworkers being paid well in excess of the comparative hourly award rate.

“In fact, the current labour shortage in Australia has meant that employers have increased the piece rates paid per unit in order to attract much needed employees.”

Citrus Australia has asked for a delay in the implementation of the draft variation, to ensure the transition can be thoroughly considered for the benefit of all parties.

Under the change, costs will rise for businesses through increased investment in additional staff for management and supervisory roles, investment in staff management technology and from paying hourly rates for poorly performing inexperienced staff, and through a predicted drop off in productivity.

“Businesses will need time to source technology, renegotiate budgets and subsequently terms with customers and clients,” Mr Hancock said.

Mr Hancock said the Commission’s conclusions that the underperforming worker will simply be replaced by another worker are made in absence of an understanding of the available workforce.

For more information:
Stephen Cooke
Citrus Australia
Tel.: +61 0427 124 437
Email: stephen.cooke@citrusaustralia.com.au

Publication date: