Sign up for our daily Newsletter and stay up to date with all the latest news!

Subscribe I am already a subscriber

You are using software which is blocking our advertisements (adblocker).

As we provide the news for free, we are relying on revenues from our banners. So please disable your adblocker and reload the page to continue using this site.
Thanks!

Click here for a guide on disabling your adblocker.

Sign up for our daily Newsletter and stay up to date with all the latest news!

Subscribe I am already a subscriber
Michigan State University Extension:

Effects of winter/road salt to West Michigan blueberries

Winter is part of the environment in which blueberries grow in the Great Lake region. As part of this ecosystem, blueberry bushes are accustomed to enduring freezing temperatures that, during the winter, can go as low as -20 degrees Fahrenheit. According to the National Weather Service, the winter of 2013-2014 has been one of the coldest in the last 20 years in the Great Lake region. When in the wild, blueberries are protected from the winter blast by the surrounding vegetation. However, when they are brought into the open, like in commercial monocultures, they are less able to stand adverse winter conditions.



Since Michigan’s blueberry production areas are located alongside Lake Michigan, they are exposed to wind and snow created by the “lake effect.” The proximity of blueberry fields to Lake Michigan (most fields are less than 20 miles from the lake shores) helps to ameliorate the impact of deep freeze temperatures during the winter. However, changes in the weather pattern during the winter and the increased pressure of the urban population entrenching in the blueberry growing areas of West Michigan increases the winter impact on overall blueberry health.

In 2014, Michigan State University conducted their first winter evaluation in the second week of March. They sampled 11 fields which included six fields that are their permanent monitoring sites for the impact of the IRSMP. Sampling included the main blueberry varieties planted in the county: Bluecrop, Elliott, Jersey and Duke. In some cases, winter damage and dieback was measured in fields with two varieties side by side. That gave us a better feeling for the winter impact on different varieties at the same location.

They found that winter damage and dieback was exacerbated by the cold winter in fields exposed to road salt aerosols from salted roads. At the six permanent monitoring sites for the evaluation of the IRSMP, damage and dieback ranged from 100 percent at blueberry bushes facing the road at the US-31 and M-45 monitoring sites to 20 percent at the Port Sheldon monitoring site (Figure 1).


Figure 1. Winter and road salt damage to flower buds in Ottawa County in 2014.

Winter damage in fields not affected by road salt can go from shoot dieback to flower buds dead or partially damaged as shown in the pictures. At those fields, flower bud damage and dieback ranged from 20 to 61 percent (Figure 2). Damage by variety indicated that in Ottawa County the least affected variety was Bluecrop followed by Duke and Jersey. However, higher flower bud mortality in Bluecrop was also related to the field location. The same variety at two fields one mile apart from each other had different amounts of damage. This difference could be as much as 40 percent.


Figure 2. Winter damage by variety in Ottawa County on non-salted roads, 2014.

MSU's preliminary evaluation indicates that in areas where minimum temperatures dropped below 0 F for several days, they expect to observe winter damage to blueberries in the range of 20 to 61 percent, depending on the variety, location and nutritional stage of the plant, except for fields affected by road salt aerosols where entire shoots are already dead or dehydrated.

For more information visit www.msue.msu.edu.
Publication date: