Sign up for our daily Newsletter and stay up to date with all the latest news!

Subscribe I am already a subscriber

You are using software which is blocking our advertisements (adblocker).

As we provide the news for free, we are relying on revenues from our banners. So please disable your adblocker and reload the page to continue using this site.
Thanks!

Click here for a guide on disabling your adblocker.

Sign up for our daily Newsletter and stay up to date with all the latest news!

Subscribe I am already a subscriber

'Mexican tomato industry won’t be able to litigate its way out of dumping charges'

Last week, in response to a lawsuit by a large Mexican tomato exporter, the U.S. Court of International Trade remanded a 2019 decision to the Department of Commerce, which had determined Mexican tomatoes were being dumped in the U.S. market. Importantly, this decision didn't invalidate the fact that dumping took place but was a procedural decision that said the Commerce Department should have used a different timeframe in determining the levels of dumping. The decision doesn't have any effect on the 2019 Suspension Agreement or the pending request by the U.S. tomato industry to terminate the Suspension Agreement due to its ineffectiveness.

"This is nothing more than a litigation tactic to delay the consequences of Mexican unfair trade practices that have been devastating the U.S. tomato industry for decades," said Michael Schadler, Executive Vice President of the Florida Tomato Exchange. "Whatever data the Commerce Department uses, the record is clear: Mexican tomatoes have been consistently dumped in the U.S. market over the last 30 years. The record is also clear that none of the Suspension Agreements have worked."

Background
In 2019, the Department of Commerce resumed its long-suspended antidumping investigation of Mexican tomato imports. The original investigation was suspended in 1996 by a series of "suspension agreements," which allowed the Mexican industry to avoid antidumping duties in exchange for certain rules meant to protect U.S. growers from Mexican dumping. The Commerce Department reopened the investigation at the request of a coalition of U.S. tomato growers led by the Florida Tomato Exchange.

The original 1996 investigation preliminarily found dumping margins as high as 188.45% and an average rate of 17.56%, but the investigation was suspended before a final determination was made. The 2019 investigation, which used updated import data, found that Mexican producers were dumping tomatoes in the U.S. by margins of up to 30.48% and an average rate of 20.91%. This proved that dumping continued, even with suspension agreements in place – agreements that were supposed to prevent such dumping.

The completion of the investigation in 2019 and a subsequent ruling from the International Trade Commission that affirmed the threat of injury to U.S. tomato growers paved the way for antidumping duties to be imposed if the current suspension agreement were to end. Indeed, that's what an overwhelming number of American tomato growers asked the Commerce Department to do in June 2023.

What's next?
The Court has ordered the Commerce Department to redo its 2019 dumping investigation by using data from the original 1996 case. Commerce has until August to make the revisions, but that deadline could be extended. The Court's decision means that American tomato farmers may have to wait even longer for U.S. trade laws to stop injurious Mexican dumping."

For more information:
Michael Schadler
Florida Tomato Exchange
Tel.: +1 (407) 660-1949
Email: michael@FloridaTomatoExchange.com

Publication date: