Job offersmore »
- Senior Inkoper - Maasdijk, Nederland
- Product Manager Biostimulants - Westmaas, the Netherlands
- Corporate Grower - Camarillo (CA), USA
- General Manager China - Kunming, China
- Buyer greenhouse crops - Almeria, Spain
- Trucking Fleet Manager - Azerbaijan
- Fresh Produce Traders Required for a Leading Dutch/UK Fresh Produce Business
- Key Accountmanager Horticulture Glass
- Product & Applicatie Specialist Opkweek
- Assistant Grower - Canada
Top 5 - yesterday
- Nominees for the 2018 Fruit Logistica Innovation Awards are announced
- Ecuador: Banana prices are expected to be high at the beginning of 2018
- Excessive temperatures worry Western Cape citrus farmers
- The new entry for the Crimson Snow family is the French Mesfruits
- "We currently distribute 7,000 to 8,000 fruit baskets a week"
Top 5 - last week
Top 5 - last month
- Amazon: Steeper price cuts at Whole Foods Market
- Year-round produce for Canada’s most northern communities
- BILLA Online Shop: over 50% of the online shopping baskets contain fresh products
- South Australia agricultural exports have increased due to new airlines
- Spain is the number one exporter of fresh fruit and vegetables globally
Exchange ratesmore »
Philippine banana exporter loses bid for $2.3m tax refund
Banana exporter Tagum Agricultural Development Corp. (Tadeco), which is entangled in a graft case, has lost its bid for a tax refund of around US $2,330,000.
In a decision dated Oct. 13, the Third Division of the Court of Tax Appeals denied Tadeco’s petition for the $2.3 million refund on creditable input value added tax for 2012 on the grounds that the company filed it more than three months late on Oct. 30, 2014.
Under the National Internal Revenue Code, Tadeco could only bring the case to the tax court within 30 days from the lapse of the 120-day period given to the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) to act on its refund claim.
The CTA ruled that like a claim for tax exemption, a refund claim “is construed strictly against the taxpayer.”
“In other words, strict compliance with the 120+30 day periods is necessary for such a claim to prosper,” it said.
It said the 120-day period started on Feb. 18, 2014, when Tadeco filed its claim, and expired on June 18, 2014. Tadeco only had until July 18, 2014 to question the BIR’s inaction.
The decision did not tackle Tadeco’s assertion that it was entitled to a refund or tax credit on excess input VAT on goods purchased to produce its Cavendish bananas for export.
Tadeco was embroiled in controversy after House Speaker Pantaleon Alvarez filed a graft complaint on March 13 against the company controlled by the family of Davao del Norte 2nd Dist. Rep. Antonio Floirendo Jr., President Duterte’s top election campaign financier.
Tadeco’s joint venture agreement with the Bureau of Corrections covered 5,308.36 hectares of Davao Penal Colony land. It was first entered into in 1969 and extended for another 25 years in May 2003.
The Commission on Audit (COA) said the agreement was unconstitutional for exceeding the size of public land that could be leased to private corporations under the present and past constitutions. COA also said the agreement violated the 50-year limit on the private use of public lands.
The Office of the Ombudsman last month found probable cause to indict Floirendo for violating the antigraft law for having direct or indirect financial interest in any transactions with the government.
Publication date: 10/23/2017
Receive the daily newsletter in your email for free | Click here
Other news in this sector: