Sign up for our daily Newsletter and stay up to date with all the latest news!

Subscribe I am already a subscriber

You are using software which is blocking our advertisements (adblocker).

As we provide the news for free, we are relying on revenues from our banners. So please disable your adblocker and reload the page to continue using this site.
Thanks!

Click here for a guide on disabling your adblocker.

Sign up for our daily Newsletter and stay up to date with all the latest news!

Subscribe I am already a subscriber

Uzbek exporters challenge new minimum prices for cherries and apricots

Uzbek exporters have raised concerns about the newly introduced minimum export prices for cherries and apricots, arguing that they distort market value and reduce profits.

The controversy, widely discussed on social media, stems from the application of a single price for different fruit varieties. Exporters claim this does not reflect actual market conditions.

In response, the Agency for Plant Quarantine and Protection stated that minimum prices are based on wholesale market data and exporter input. The process is coordinated with the Chamber of Commerce and grounded in market analysis.

The agency emphasized that the policy aims to prevent artificial undervaluation of exports, secure foreign currency revenue, and combat the shadow economy.

As of June 6, the average farm gate price for cherry varieties "Valovaya" and Sweet Ariyana ranged between 45,000 and 55,000 UZS ($3.60–$4.40) per kilogram. Still, some exporters reportedly declare prices below $1/kg, which regulators say is unrealistic.

According to 2025 export statistics, Uzbek cherries are sold abroad at the following prices:

  • Russia: $4/kg
  • South Korea: $6–7/kg
  • China: $4.5–6/kg
  • Gulf countries: up to $13/kg

Authorities argue that underreporting prices lowers tax and currency inflows. They stress that minimum prices are flexible and can be updated regularly, especially during peak season.

Exporters are invited to submit feedback via a Telegram group or phone. Officials maintain that the measure is a regulatory tool to ensure transparency, not market interference.

Source: podrobno.uz