Sign up for our daily Newsletter and stay up to date with all the latest news!

Subscribe I am already a subscriber

You are using software which is blocking our advertisements (adblocker).

As we provide the news for free, we are relying on revenues from our banners. So please disable your adblocker and reload the page to continue using this site.
Thanks!

Click here for a guide on disabling your adblocker.

Sign up for our daily Newsletter and stay up to date with all the latest news!

Subscribe I am already a subscriber

P-coumaroylquinic acid as a Sharka indicator

The Plum Pox Virus (PPV), the causal agent of Sharka disease, is the worst virus that can affect plums, as it causes great economic damage.

To better understand how plants react against the infection, researchers from the University of Ljubljana (Slovenia) studied the changes in phenol composition of local cultivar Domača češplja (Prunus domestica L.).

The phenol composition was determined for visually undeformed necrotic tissues during the last three ripening stages. Results showed the composition was significantly changed as regards anthocyanins, flavonoids and hydroxycinnamics acids in most necrotic tissues.

Phenol compounds differed greatly also between developing stages, providing an idea of the phenol profile of fallen unripe fruit. The study showed how the PPV infection induces flavonoid biosynthesis in plums.

"In addition to the high flavonoid level, the content of p-coumaroylquinic acid was also higher in infected tissues. As similar changes were observed in the tissue of other fruits stressed by biotic and abitic agents, p-coumaroylquinic acid can be considered a good stress indicator and therefore be used in various studies such as for example those for fruit physiology or as a stress indicator even before the onset of visible symptoms. It could also be useful to detect latent or hidden infections."

Source: Valentina Usenik, Franci Stampar, Damijana Kastelec, Mojca Virscek Marn, 'How does sharka affect the phenolics of plum fruit (Prunus domestica L.)?', 2017, Hort. Sci. (Prague), Vol. 44 (2): 64–72, doi: 10.17221/196/2015-HORTSCI
Publication date: