Sign up for our daily Newsletter and stay up to date with all the latest news!

Subscribe I am already a subscriber

You are using software which is blocking our advertisements (adblocker).

As we provide the news for free, we are relying on revenues from our banners. So please disable your adblocker and reload the page to continue using this site.
Thanks!

Click here for a guide on disabling your adblocker.

Sign up for our daily Newsletter and stay up to date with all the latest news!

Subscribe I am already a subscriber
International Federation for Produce Standards (IFPS)

Re-assignment of PLU codes on horizon

As the adoption of price look-up codes (PLU) has gained traction, the International Federation for Produce Standards (IFPS) has committed to transitioning the previously unused ‘8’ prefix to accommodate an increase in varieties of fresh produce items as they enter the market. The transition comes at a time when the demand for the voluntary codes, used for price identification in retail, is increasing in North America, Europe, South America, Australia, New Zealand and more recently, Mexico.

The voluntary PLU system has been utilized by retailers since 1990 for pricing, inventory control and sales data. A change in the criteria used by IFPS to determine PLU code eligibility has made acquiring the unique codes somewhat easier – generally speaking, the main requirement is based on ensuring the item is a unique variety and is readily available for multiple companies to produce and market to consumers. IFPS has also eliminated the stipulation that patented items were ineligible.

Though the ‘8’ prefix (83000 – 84999) was once reserved for GMO produce items, the prefix was never used at retail. Stripping the prefix of this particular designation will yield one thousand additional PLU numbers to be used in future years. This will not in any way impact the current use of the ‘9’ prefix (93000-94999) which will continue to be used to indicate organic produce items.

“It is important that we make the industry aware of this re-assignment of the ‘8’ prefix well in advance,” said Ed Treacy, chairman of the IFPS Board. “There is more demand for conventional produce PLU numbers and we’ve exhausted every attempt to secure additional number ranges to use. To date, we have never seen the 8 prefix used at retail. This is not a statement on the social or scientific acceptance of GMO items; it is simply that methods other than PLUs are being used to communicate regulatory and other information to consumers.”

The IFPS does not anticipate issuing PLUs in the newly released 83000-84999 series for some time but it is important for industry to understand the change that will occur in the future.

For more information:
International Federation for Produce Standards (IFPS)
Email: plu@ifpsglobal.com
www.ifpsglobal.com/PLU
Publication date: