Based on your current location, we selected the North America edition of FreshPlaza.com for you I want to remain in this edition
Please click one of the other regions below to switch to another edition.

world_map North America Latin America Oceania Africa Asia Europe


Job offersmore »

Specialsmore »

Top 5 - yesterday

Top 5 - last week

Top 5 - last month

Exchange ratesmore »

European Food Safety Authority

Risk assessment vs risk management: What’s the difference?

The decision to separate the tasks of risk assessment and risk management just over a decade ago has transformed the safety of Europe’s food. And while there is wide recognition that this change has strengthened the safety of the food chain, uncertainty can still exist over the difference in roles and responsibilities of risk assessors and risk managers.

Ensuring food is safe from farm to fork is complex and challenging. It demands that strict safety measures are applied at all stages of the supply chain. Risk assessment and risk management are central pillars in this process.

Separation of roles
So what is the difference between these two key activities? Risk assessors provide independent scientific advice on potential threats in the food chain. Risk managers use this advice as a basis for making decisions to address these issues. At a European level, this separation of roles is fundamental and enshrined in law. It was introduced to make clear the distinction between science and politics; to place independent science-based assessment at the heart of policy making.

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) plays a pivotal role in ensuring that Europe’s food is safe. But it is just one part of an EU-wide framework which includes many different partners. EFSA is the principal risk assessor in Europe, evaluating threats associated with the food chain. The risk managers are the European Commission, Member State authorities and the European Parliament. Between them they are responsible for developing policies, authorising products and making laws on food based on EFSA’s scientific advice.

Advice not authorisation
For example, EFSA evaluates the safety of GMO applications on a case by case basis. The Authority’s role ends there. It is the risk managers in the European Commission and Member States that decide whether to authorise each GMO. The same is true in a host of other areas: for pesticides such as neonicotinoids, for food contact materials used in food packaging and for feed additives to name a few. In each case, EFSA provides independent science-based advice and risk managers decide on the appropriate action using the Authority’s expert conclusions as the foundation for their decisions.

So how does EFSA work? It is a common misconception that scientists at EFSA carry out experiments and use the results as the basis for its scientific opinions. EFSA does not have laboratories and nor does it generate new scientific research. Instead, EFSA is tasked under EU law with collecting existing research and data. The Authority’s scientists then analyse this information and produce scientific advice to support decision-making by risk managers.

The food that reaches consumers’ plates is safer today than it has ever been – although important work always remains to be done. Central to this ongoing progress is the split between risk assessment and risk management – separating the experts who deliver science-based opinions from those charged with implementing rules based on this advice.

Please visit www.efsa.europa.eu for more information.

Publication date: 4/16/2014


Receive the daily newsletter in your email for free | Click here


Other news in this sector: