Job offersmore »
- Supply Chain and Inventory Manager - Bologna, Italy
- Associate Director Global Procurement - Berlin, Germany
- FRUIT Buyer / Procurement / Purchase Manager 採購/買手 - Hong Kong
- Plant Specialist Horticulture Nordics - Finland
- International Account Manager City Farming - Netherlands
- CEO - Prague
- Plant Specialist - Melbourne, Australia
- General Manager European Region - Bologna, Italy
- Einkaufsverantwortlicher / Kundenbetreuer - Die Schweiz
- Continuous Improvement Specialist - Berkel en Rodenrijs, Nederland
Top 5 - yesterday
- US Romaine lettuce E. coli outbreak quite relentless
- A challenging new citrus import season from southern hemisphere
- NZ: Spraying without chemicals, residues or health and safety issues
- Busy first day of CPMA show in sunny Vancouver
- "Rumours causing importers to switch from Chinese to Spanish garlic"
Top 5 - last week
Top 5 - last month
Exchange ratesmore »
Grocers claim potato cartel fixes pricesA nationwide potato cartel - the "OPEC of potatoes" - fixes prices and production to line its own pockets, a grocers association claims in a federal antitrust complaint.
Associated Wholesale Grocers sued the United Potato Growers of America (UPGA), the United Potato Growers of Idaho (UPGI) and 20 other entities.
The defendants own more than 80 percent of the potato acreage in the United States, and used OPEC as a model, according to the complaint.
"Defendants analogised their potato cartel to the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries ('OPEC') - the notorious petroleum supply-reduction and price-fixing cartel composed of various foreign nations. Defendants suggested that they should 'study' the OPEC model and their organisation was referred to as the 'OPEC of Potatoes,'" the complaint states.
The grocers claim: "Defendants, who include the largest potato growers and shippers in the United States, conspired to use pre-harvest and post-harvest methods to control and reduce the supply of potatoes in order to raise and stabilise the prices at which potatoes were sold in the United States.
"In order to facilitate the conspiracy, the defendants first came together in 2004 to form regional and nationwide 'cooperatives' - not for the purpose of marketing and selling their potato products collectively, as is the function of a traditional cooperative - but rather for the purpose of creating a national vehicle for potato growers and their co-conspirators to reduce potato output and fix prices."
A November 2004 meeting of potato growers from across the Western United States "announced the group's price-fixing plans to several hundred potato farmers, which prompted a standing ovation," the complaint states. "Many farmers signed on to the supply reduction agreement on the spot, agreeing to pay annual dues ranging from about $10,000 to $50,000 depending on how much acreage each farmer utilised for growing potatoes."
To read the full article click here.
Publication date: 4/23/2013
Receive the daily newsletter in your email for free | Click here
Other news in this sector: